arsenm wrote: > Just a note - and maybe this was already discussed above - is there good > reason not to explicitly make this type a 128-bit scalar? The LLVM data > layout already does this
I thought this was the 160 bit version? Can we have an opaque-but-sized type? The concern is exposing this as a raw pointer right away https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94830 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
