Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrue...@tum.de>, Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrue...@tum.de>, Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrue...@tum.de>, Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrue...@tum.de>, Paul =?utf-8?q?Heidekrüger?= <paul.heidekrue...@tum.de> Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95...@github.com>
carlosgalvezp wrote: The check certainly doesn't need to fully implement the guideline right now, it can be done in small steps iteratively. I envision that over time the check will fully implement the rule as much as possible. We typically want a 1:1 mapping between a check and a rule. In other words, it would not be good to have N checks implementing different aspects of SL.3, it should be only 1 check. The reason I'm being picky with the name is that it's costly to change it later, it takes 2 clang tidy releases i.e 1 year. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95220 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
