JonChesterfield wrote:

@arsenm You're right about passing larger things indirectly. I'm intending to 
land this as-is, with the types inlined, as that unblocks #93362. I'm nervous 
that the extra pointer indirection will hit the same memory error that tweaking 
codegen in that patch hits (it's a similar sort of pattern to the top level 
argument passing) and wish to postpone that until there is a working baseline.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94083
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to