Endilll wrote: > This means that we must perform the second (unqualified) lookup during > parsing even when the type of the object expression is dependent, but those > results are not used to determine whether a < token is the start of a > template-argument_list; they are stored so we can replicate the second lookup > during instantiation.
If I understand correctly, you point to a conflict between http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.lookup#qual.general-3.sentence-3 and http://eel.is/c++draft/temp.res#temp.dep.type-6. Have you considered filing a Core issue? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92957 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
