efriedma-quic wrote: I'm skeptical it's correct to skip all the assertions like this; the assertions are there to ensure the layout of the LLVM IR type matches the layout provided by the RecordLayout. If the LLVM IR layout is wrong, address-related computations will be wrong, and ultimately you'll miscompile. We don't really care whether the RecordLayout is consistent with language rules.
The correct answer here is probably to fix the sizes in the RecordLayout itself; in particular, the DataSize of the members. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93809 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
