malcolm.parsons added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26768#618651, @dcoughlin wrote:
> The definite false positives were cases where the programmer seemed aware of
> the semantics of virtual calls during construction/destruction and had each
> subclass explicitly call its own version of the virtual method in question.
How is this avoiding the check for a qualifier on the call?
if (CME->getQualifier())
callIsNonVirtual = true;
> The likely false positives were cases where there was no subclass of the
> constructed class that overrode the method in question.
I'd like to be told about these so that the class can be marked final.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26768
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
