================
@@ -403,4 +405,35 @@ TEST_F(EnvironmentTest,
Contains(Member));
}
+TEST_F(EnvironmentTest, Stmt) {
+ using namespace ast_matchers;
+
+ std::string Code = R"cc(
+ struct S {int i;};
+ void foo() {
+ S AnS = S{1};
+ }
----------------
martinboehme wrote:
> A variable declaration outside a function doesn't actually exist within a
> Stmt, nor is it a Stmt.
But isn't this the use case for which you're making the change in this PR?
I don't see why you need the variable declaration to be a `Stmt` though. In any
case, you're only analyzing the initializer, not the `DeclStmt` itself. Instead
of searching for the `DeclStmt`, you could search for the `VarDecl` and then
initialize the `Environment` with the `getInit()` of that `VarDecl`. This
wouldn't make the test any more complicated and would be equivalent to what
you're testing here?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91616
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
