erichkeane wrote: > > I think this needs a release note? I know the only case we have right now > > is because of your other patch, but perhaps this affects elsewhere too? > > @erichkeane I don't think we need a release note since the code changes are > in `LookupMemberExpr`, which prior to #90152 had no valid code path for > dependent types (and had the assert `assert(!BaseType->isDependentType())` to > ensure this).
Ah! Missed that, yes, you're right. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91972 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
