Jim M. R. =?utf-8?q?Teichgräber?=,Jim M. R. =?utf-8?q?Teichgräber?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91...@github.com>


AaronBallman wrote:

> > > Btw, you can probably move this PR out of Draft status, it seems awfully 
> > > close to finished
> > 
> > 
> > I'll finish implementing your suggestions, run the tests again locally and 
> > then move it out of draft, if that's alright with you :).
> 
> Either way is fine I’d say, but the thing is that I personally at least would 
> use draft prs mainly for something where I’m nowhere close to done and it’s 
> not really ready for review because things are probably going to change, but 
> I just want to signal that I’m working on it. If it’s something that’s mostly 
> done or which is at least mostly review-ready, then I’d just use a regular 
> pr, but that’s just how I do it.

FWIW, that's what I'm used to as well. I usually ignore anything marked "Draft" 
on the assumption it's not ready for review, but I happened to remember the 
discussion on the issue and peeked at this one anyway. :-)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91891
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to