github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff 1494d8849fa2aef575dabd431b0060639f4a57c1
7b2f3da17dfc93a4f0aa69ad4da90707b6f2e8b6 -- clang/lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp
clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
clang/test/CXX/temp/temp.res/temp.dep/temp.dep.type/p4.cpp
``````````
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
index 7e57fa0696..2fce2238f9 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
@@ -750,7 +750,8 @@ Sema::ActOnDependentIdExpression(const CXXScopeSpec &SS,
if (!MightBeCxx11UnevalField && !isAddressOfOperand && !IsEnum &&
isa<CXXMethodDecl>(DC) &&
cast<CXXMethodDecl>(DC)->isImplicitObjectMemberFunction()) {
- QualType ThisType =
cast<CXXMethodDecl>(DC)->getThisType().getNonReferenceType();
+ QualType ThisType =
+ cast<CXXMethodDecl>(DC)->getThisType().getNonReferenceType();
// Since the 'this' expression is synthesized, we don't need to
// perform the double-lookup check.
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91620
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
