ian-twilightcoder wrote: > I think I like this as a solution, although I wonder if > __stdarg_guard_macro.h would be a better name. The name now somewhat implies > that it contains the macros that stddef and stdarg define.
But the macros don't actually guard anything. _macro isn't the best name in the world though, maybe _header_macro.h is ok even though they aren't traditional "header macros"? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90676 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
