================
@@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ char f_int_4(char x) { return x; }
// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} fp128 @f_ld(fp128 noundef %x)
long double f_ld(long double x) { return x; }
+// Empty struct is lowered as a placeholder word parameter.
+struct empty {};
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} i64 @f_empty(i64 %x.coerce)
+struct empty f_empty(struct empty x) { return x; }
+
----------------
koachan wrote:
> struct with an empty base class
I don't think that this would affect C++, given that it already specifies empty
structs/classes to have a size of one byte.
This is only an issue for C when using GCC's empty struct extension (as empty
structs are zero bytes in it)...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90338
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
