https://github.com/5chmidti commented:
Do we maybe want to explicitly match `decltype`, `sizeof`, `static_cast` etc. instead of `typeLoc`? Because I don't think we would want to ignore https://godbolt.org/z/r3bK961do ```c++ #include <optional> constexpr std::optional<int> foo() { return 42; } constexpr int select(std::optional<int> val) { return val.value_or(0); } template <int val> struct bar {}; void use() { using F = bar<select(foo().value())>; } ``` (There are other checks with this ignore pattern, depending on the answer to my question we should check those as well) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90410 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
