OCHyams wrote: @Michael137 said:
> Btw, as a follow-up to this patch should we check that this is compatible > with dsymutil (i.e., running dsymutil --verify)? I suspect it might need a > fixup (given LLDB doesn't even support this tag) `dsymutil --verify` seems to be happy with the tag. Upon closer inspection, I think it uses the same "verifier" code as llvm-dwarfdump so that makes sense (#89589). There's a couple of switches in llvm/lib/DWARFLinker that look like they want a DW_TAG_template_alias: `DependencyTracker::isTypeTableCandidate` in `DependencyTracker.cpp` `AcceleratorRecordsSaver::save` in `AcceleratorRecordsSaver.cpp`. I'm not sure what a test for those would look like but I can look into it if you'd like? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87623 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
