================
@@ -842,25 +842,6 @@ void Linux::addProfileRTLibs(const llvm::opt::ArgList
&Args,
ToolChain::addProfileRTLibs(Args, CmdArgs);
}
-llvm::DenormalMode
-Linux::getDefaultDenormalModeForType(const llvm::opt::ArgList &DriverArgs,
- const JobAction &JA,
- const llvm::fltSemantics *FPType) const {
- switch (getTriple().getArch()) {
----------------
jyknight wrote:
No, we shouldn't. This was discussed before:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80475#issuecomment-1928170074 and
surrounding comments.
But in short: doing so would regress normal code, only for the (arguable)
benefit of code which is explicitly asks to play fast-and-loose with the rules
via `-ffast-math`.
I think the change is good as-is.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80475
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
