lukasza added a comment. Do we also need to update the documentation (e.g. to say that ElaboratedType is covered by hasDeclaration)?
Other than that, I think this CL LGTM, although I would like to have a specific, working equivalent of the old, deep-maching hasDeclaration (at least when the inner, deep match is for tag types). Let's continue this discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D27207 https://reviews.llvm.org/D27104 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
