================
@@ -4781,6 +4782,7 @@ CodeGenModule::CreateRuntimeFunction(llvm::FunctionType
*FTy, StringRef Name,
}
}
setDSOLocal(F);
+ markRegisterParameterAttributes(F);
----------------
efriedma-quic wrote:
To clarify, the code in llvm/ still needs to exist because we need some
approximation of the calling convention even if we don't have access to the
clang AST. But clang shouldn't use it; clang's native representation of
calling conventions is better.
(It's a long-standing request to try to give LLVM a representation of calling
conventions that's closer to clang's representation, but it's a large problem,
and nobody has really made any progress on it.)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89707
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
