It looks like patches 1 and 2 made it but 3 and 4 didn't. Do you no longer need them?
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Steven Wu via cfe-commits < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Ping. I don't know who is the best review for the patches. Thanks for > Rafael looking at the LLVM change. Richard, do you have any opinions on the > clang changes? > > Thanks > > Steven > > > On Feb 18, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Steven Wu <steve...@apple.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all > > > > I put up some patches for embedding bitcode inside the object file > (-fembed-bitcode) option. As I described in the dev list before, the new > option can create normal object file with bitcode embedded in a special > section. You can easily recreate the same object file with the embedded > bitcode in it. > > > > I split the patch into several parts: > > llvm patch: > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D17388: Introduce the section for embedding > bitcode in MachO file. > > > > There are four clang patches: > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D17390: Implementing the clang driver for the > new option. > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D17392: Teach clang how to embed bitcode into > the object file. > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D17393: Slightly tweak the bitcode emitted in > embed bitcode stage 1. > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D17394: Reduce the amount of option gets > embedded in the bitcode by introducing a whitelist and a blacklist. > > > > Let me know if anyone is interested in helping reviewing these changes. > > > > Thanks > > > > Steven > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
