AaronBallman wrote: > > One question I have is whether it would make sense to modify > > DestroyTemplateIdAnnotationsRAIIObj to not call MaybeDestroyTemplateIds() > > in the first place > > I’d love to try if it were feasible, but please note that the annotation > (that is, C from the parameter header ‘C Default = decltype(lambda)’ in this > case; sorry I’m typing on the phone) was deleted by a direct call to > MaybeDestroyTemplateIds, not using the RAII object. I tried to teach > DestroyTemplateIdAnnotationsRAIIObj to have opt-in destruction, but I soon > realized that would introduce more complexity/changes to callers of > ParseStatementOrDeclaration, because that function isn’t aware of the context > if it should clean up annotations immediately.
Ah! Thank you for the explanation! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89494 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
