================ @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +//===--- ReturnConstRefFromParameterCheck.cpp - clang-tidy ----------------===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#include "ReturnConstRefFromParameterCheck.h" +#include "../utils/Matchers.h" +#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h" +#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h" + +using namespace clang::ast_matchers; + +namespace clang::tidy::bugprone { + +void ReturnConstRefFromParameterCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) { + Finder->addMatcher( + returnStmt(hasReturnValue(declRefExpr(to(parmVarDecl(hasType( + hasCanonicalType(matchers::isReferenceToConst()))))))) + .bind("ret"), + this); +} + +void ReturnConstRefFromParameterCheck::check( + const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) { + const auto *R = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<ReturnStmt>("ret"); + diag(R->getRetValue()->getBeginLoc(), + "return const reference parameter cause potential use-after-free " + "when function accepts immediately constructed value."); ---------------- 5chmidti wrote:
What do you think about `returning a const reference parameter may cause a use-after-free when the parameter is constructed from a temporary` (`const` vs `constant` argument in the other thread aside) I'm not sure if it should be `may` or `will`, because it is only a use-after-free if the returned value is actually used (FWICT). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89497 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits