jansvoboda11 wrote:

> Is this a pre-existing issue, or did my patch change to make "each textual 
> header gets a `HFI`"?

I'm not sure yet, I think we'll need to investigate [Sam's 
reproducer](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89005#issuecomment-2067300965)
 and consider [Richard's 
comment](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83660#discussion_r1568027778).
 It's possible that we now really do end up with header file infos for textual 
headers where we didn't before, which triggers the virality much more often.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89441
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to