================
@@ -69,9 +73,13 @@ void
LambdaFunctionNameCheck::storeOptions(ClangTidyOptions::OptionMap &Opts) {
}
void LambdaFunctionNameCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
- // Match on PredefinedExprs inside a lambda.
- Finder->addMatcher(predefinedExpr(hasAncestor(lambdaExpr())).bind("E"),
- this);
+ Finder->addMatcher(
+ cxxMethodDecl(isInLambda(),
+ hasBody(hasDescendant(expr(
----------------
PiotrZSL wrote:
May work, as forEachDescendant may be doing new "set" of variables, to be sure
try this:
```
[] {
struct S {
void f() {
__func__;
}
};
__func__();
struct S2 {
void f() {
__func__;
}
};
__func__();
}();
```
If it work correctly then both func should be found.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89076
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
