================
@@ -6390,6 +6394,7 @@ TEST(HasTemplateArgumentLoc, 
BindsToSpecializationWithDoubleArgument) {
                               0, hasTypeLoc(loc(asString("double")))))))))));
 }
 
+#if 0
----------------
sdkrystian wrote:

@erichkeane I just pushed a commit which converts all the `#if`'d out test to 
use `hasTemplateArgument`/`hasAnyTemplateArgument` instead of 
`hasTemplateArgumentLoc`/`hasAnyTemplateArgumentLoc`. However, this is a 
temporary measure.

I want to add support for `ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl`, 
`VarTemplateSpecializationDecl`, and `FunctionDecl` to 
`hasTemplateArgumentLoc`/`hasAnyTemplateArgumentLoc` so these tests can be 
switched back to using the `TemplateArgumentLoc` matchers, but I'm not sure 
whether it should be included in this PR, or have it's own follow-up PR (I 
would prefer to include it in this one).

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81642
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to