estewart08 wrote: > > Is it expected now that `clang --print-runtime-dir` will always have the > > clang host triple appended even if `LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR` is > > off? I guess I was expecting to see `lib/linux` instead of > > `lib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`. > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D98868 introduced `--print-runtime-dir`. The > question is whether `--print-runtime-dir` should print the legacy `lib/linux` > when `LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR` is off. Personally I'd hope that > `--print-runtime-dir` does not try to be smart and users should be able to > expect that it always prints the new hierarchy. > > With the old hierarchy, the user is expected to know how to derive > `libclang_rt.builtins-aarch64.a` from `libclang_rt.builtins.a`. In this case, > they can extract the directory name from `clang > --print-file-name=libclang_rt.builtins-aarch64.a`.
Just odd that a legitimate configuration `LLVM_ENABLE_PER_TARGET_RUNTIME_DIR=OFF`, unless this configuration is no longer valid, will result in a non-existent path being returned for the runtime directory. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87866 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
