================
@@ -1822,28 +1822,106 @@ void WriteSemanticSpellingSwitch(const std::string
&VarName,
OS << " }\n";
}
+enum class LateAttrParseKind {
+ LateAttrParsingNever = 0,
+ LateAttrParsingAlways = 1,
+ LateAttrParsingExperimentalOnly = 2
+};
+
----------------
delcypher wrote:
Yes. The current implementation relies on the name of the enum value and the
name in `Attr.td` file being the same for the purposes of verifying the enum is
in sync with the corresponding definition in the `Attr.td` file.
You can see this here:
```c++
#define CASE(X) \
case LateAttrParseKind::X: \
if (LAPK->getName().compare(#X) != 0) {
```
`LAPK->getName()` is the name of the definition in the `Attr.td` file and `X`
in the macro if the enum name in the `LateAttrParseKind`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88596
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
