dougsonos wrote:

> One thing I noticed you bring up on Discourse and which I agree is probably 
> for the better: this pr can just be about introducing an effect system; 
> actually using it can be deferred to a follow-up pr. This pr is already big 
> enough if you consider just those changes, and there’s already enough to 
> consider here to the point that _also_ trying to review the analysis part of 
> this here would probably get too messy...

Yeah, when things settle down from this latest round of feedback, I'll back out 
as much as possible for "phase two".

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84983
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to