rjmccall wrote: > Why can't we just declare that the "generic" address-space must always be 0? > The specific numbers we use for address-spaces are completely arbitrary > anyway.
I don't think this works; there's nothing that LLVM could possibly do with a generic AS that would justify it being called out in the representation like this, because the existence of a generic AS is a deeply non-portable concept. The only AS that I think would be worthwhile to call out like this would be the `alloca` AS, and in fact I tried to argue that as a reason not to introduce the `alloca` AS to `DataLayout` in the first place. Unfortunately, I lost that argument, IIRC because some targets were adamant that they wanted to vary the `alloca` AS between functions. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88182 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
