github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff c7db450e5c1a83ea768765dcdedfd50f3358d418
3bc2d71cbe5e5613b430968fe84023a736072e54 -- clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
clang/test/SemaCXX/type-traits.cpp
``````````
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
index 7d7be27a86..ed18c9021e 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
@@ -5843,7 +5843,8 @@ static bool EvaluateBinaryTypeTrait(Sema &Self, TypeTrait
BTT, const TypeSourceI
return false;
if (Self.RequireCompleteType(
- Rhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), RhsT,
diag::err_incomplete_type_used_in_type_trait_expr))
+ Rhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), RhsT,
+ diag::err_incomplete_type_used_in_type_trait_expr))
return false;
return BaseInterface->isSuperClassOf(DerivedInterface);
@@ -5866,8 +5867,9 @@ static bool EvaluateBinaryTypeTrait(Sema &Self, TypeTrait
BTT, const TypeSourceI
// If Base and Derived are class types and are different types
// (ignoring possible cv-qualifiers) then Derived shall be a
// complete type.
- if (Self.RequireCompleteType(Rhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), RhsT,
- diag::err_incomplete_type_used_in_type_trait_expr))
+ if (Self.RequireCompleteType(
+ Rhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), RhsT,
+ diag::err_incomplete_type_used_in_type_trait_expr))
return false;
return cast<CXXRecordDecl>(rhsRecord->getDecl())
@@ -5919,7 +5921,8 @@ static bool EvaluateBinaryTypeTrait(Sema &Self, TypeTrait
BTT, const TypeSourceI
return LhsT->isVoidType();
// A function definition requires a complete, non-abstract return type.
- if (!Self.isCompleteType(Rhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), RhsT) ||
Self.isAbstractType(Rhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), RhsT))
+ if (!Self.isCompleteType(Rhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), RhsT) ||
+ Self.isAbstractType(Rhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), RhsT))
return false;
// Compute the result of add_rvalue_reference.
@@ -5969,12 +5972,14 @@ static bool EvaluateBinaryTypeTrait(Sema &Self,
TypeTrait BTT, const TypeSourceI
// For both, T and U shall be complete types, (possibly cv-qualified)
// void, or arrays of unknown bound.
if (!LhsT->isVoidType() && !LhsT->isIncompleteArrayType() &&
- Self.RequireCompleteType(Lhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), LhsT,
- diag::err_incomplete_type_used_in_type_trait_expr))
+ Self.RequireCompleteType(
+ Lhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), LhsT,
+ diag::err_incomplete_type_used_in_type_trait_expr))
return false;
if (!RhsT->isVoidType() && !RhsT->isIncompleteArrayType() &&
- Self.RequireCompleteType(Rhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), RhsT,
- diag::err_incomplete_type_used_in_type_trait_expr))
+ Self.RequireCompleteType(
+ Rhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), RhsT,
+ diag::err_incomplete_type_used_in_type_trait_expr))
return false;
// cv void is never assignable.
@@ -6029,9 +6034,11 @@ static bool EvaluateBinaryTypeTrait(Sema &Self,
TypeTrait BTT, const TypeSourceI
}
case BTT_IsLayoutCompatible: {
if (!LhsT->isVoidType() && !LhsT->isIncompleteArrayType())
- Self.RequireCompleteType(Lhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), LhsT,
diag::err_incomplete_type);
+ Self.RequireCompleteType(Lhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), LhsT,
+ diag::err_incomplete_type);
if (!RhsT->isVoidType() && !RhsT->isIncompleteArrayType())
- Self.RequireCompleteType(Rhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), RhsT,
diag::err_incomplete_type);
+ Self.RequireCompleteType(Rhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), RhsT,
+ diag::err_incomplete_type);
if (LhsT->isVariableArrayType())
Self.Diag(Lhs->getTypeLoc().getBeginLoc(), diag::err_vla_unsupported)
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88097
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
