================
@@ -1230,11 +1230,26 @@ CodeGenFunction::EmitCXXForRangeStmt(const
CXXForRangeStmt &S,
JumpDest LoopExit = getJumpDestInCurrentScope("for.end");
LexicalScope ForScope(*this, S.getSourceRange());
+ const DeclStmt *RangeDS = cast<DeclStmt>(S.getRangeStmt());
+ const VarDecl *RangeVar = cast<VarDecl>(RangeDS->getSingleDecl());
+ if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus23)
----------------
efriedma-quic wrote:
`for (auto &&x : B{A()}) {}` currently works correctly, as far as I know (where
B is a class with a member of type `const A&`). And if I'm understanding
correctly, `for (auto &&x : B{}) {}` is supposed to be semantically equivalent.
If the AST is significantly different, you should be addressing that in Sema,
I think.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86960
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
