================
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple %itanium_abi_triple -Wunused -x c -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple %itanium_abi_triple -Wunused -x c++
-verify=expected,cxx %s
+
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+extern "C" {
+#endif
+static int f(void) { return 42; }
+int g(void) __attribute__((alias("f")));
----------------
nickdesaulniers wrote:
> Improving GCC consistency is not the goal of this PR. This PR intends to make
> clangSema and clangCodeGen consistent.
Is there a bug on file wrt to this inconsistency? I would like to link to it
from the test, sources, and public docs on the function attribute if we don't
fix this inconsistency BEFORE landing this PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87130
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
