llvmbot wrote:

<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Julian Nagele (juliannagele)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

When generating tbaa.struct metadata we treat multiple adjacent bitfields as a 
single "field", with one corresponding entry in the metadata. At the moment 
this is achieved by adding an entry for the first bitfield in the run using its 
StorageSize and skipping the remaining bitfields. The problem is that "first" 
is determined by checking that the Offset of the field in the run is 0, which 
breaks for big endian.

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87753.diff


2 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenTBAA.cpp (+5-1) 
- (modified) clang/test/CodeGen/tbaa-struct-bitfield-endianness.cpp (+3-7) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenTBAA.cpp 
b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenTBAA.cpp
index a1e14c5f0a8c78..0ddefc4751b08c 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenTBAA.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenTBAA.cpp
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 #include "clang/AST/Mangle.h"
 #include "clang/AST/RecordLayout.h"
 #include "clang/Basic/CodeGenOptions.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h"
 #include "llvm/ADT/SmallSet.h"
 #include "llvm/IR/Constants.h"
 #include "llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h"
@@ -319,7 +320,10 @@ CodeGenTBAA::CollectFields(uint64_t BaseOffset,
       // base type.
       if ((*i)->isBitField()) {
         const CGBitFieldInfo &Info = CGRL.getBitFieldInfo(*i);
-        if (Info.Offset != 0)
+        bool IsBE = Context.getTargetInfo().isBigEndian();
+        bool IsFirst = IsBE ? Info.StorageSize - (Info.Offset + Info.Size) == 0
+                            : Info.Offset == 0;
+        if (!IsFirst)
           continue;
         unsigned CurrentBitFieldSize = Info.StorageSize;
         uint64_t Size =
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/tbaa-struct-bitfield-endianness.cpp 
b/clang/test/CodeGen/tbaa-struct-bitfield-endianness.cpp
index 80884b49ddc669..e8bb46982537bb 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGen/tbaa-struct-bitfield-endianness.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/tbaa-struct-bitfield-endianness.cpp
@@ -1,13 +1,10 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64_be-apple-darwin -emit-llvm -o - -O1 %s | \
-// RUN:     FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-BE %s
+// RUN:     FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK %s
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64-apple-darwin -emit-llvm -o - -O1 %s | \
-// RUN:     FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-LE %s
+// RUN:     FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK %s
 //
 // Check that TBAA metadata for structs containing bitfields is
 // consistent between big and little endian layouts.
-//
-// FIXME: The metadata below is invalid for the big endian layout: the
-// start offset of 2 is incorrect.
 
 struct NamedBitfields {
   int f1 : 8;
@@ -28,8 +25,7 @@ void copy(NamedBitfields *a1, NamedBitfields *a2) {
   *a1 = *a2;
 }
 
-// CHECK-BE: [[TBAA_STRUCT2]] = !{i64 2, i64 4, [[META3:![0-9]+]], i64 4, i64 
4, [[META6:![0-9]+]], i64 8, i64 8, [[META8:![0-9]+]]}
-// CHECK-LE: [[TBAA_STRUCT2]] = !{i64 0, i64 4, [[META3:![0-9]+]], i64 4, i64 
4, [[META6:![0-9]+]], i64 8, i64 8, [[META8:![0-9]+]]}
+// CHECK: [[TBAA_STRUCT2]] = !{i64 0, i64 4, [[META3:![0-9]+]], i64 4, i64 4, 
[[META6:![0-9]+]], i64 8, i64 8, [[META8:![0-9]+]]}
 // CHECK: [[META3]] = !{[[META4:![0-9]+]], [[META4]], i64 0}
 // CHECK: [[META4]] = !{!"omnipotent char", [[META5:![0-9]+]], i64 0}
 // CHECK: [[META5]] = !{!"Simple C++ TBAA"}

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87753
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to