================
@@ -1836,7 +1836,19 @@ static TemplateParameterList 
*GetTemplateParameterList(TemplateDecl *TD) {
   // Make sure we get the template parameter list from the most
   // recent declaration, since that is the only one that is guaranteed to
   // have all the default template argument information.
-  return cast<TemplateDecl>(TD->getMostRecentDecl())->getTemplateParameters();
+  Decl *ND = TD->getMostRecentDecl();
+  // Skip past friend Decls because they are not supposed to contain default
+  // template arguments. Moreover, these declarations may introduce template
+  // parameters living in different template depths than the corresponding
+  // template parameters in TD, causing unmatched constraint substitution.
+  //
+  // C++23 N4950 [temp.param]p12
----------------
zyn0217 wrote:

> In that case it’d make sense to add a test for a friend function template as 
> well if there isn’t already one to make sure this change doesn’t break that.

I think the change is probably fine for friend function templates with default 
template parameters: they're unique across one TU, and we have ensured the next 
declaration we visit is non-null. So in such cases, I think ND would be the 
equivalent to "the most recent Decl".

> but maybe cite the C++20 then in this case if it was added in C++20.

Finally, I decided to use N3337 (aka C++11) since I couldn't find any related 
words prior to that draft, although gcc and clang don't allow such default 
arguments even in 98/03 mode.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86914
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to