================ @@ -1836,7 +1836,19 @@ static TemplateParameterList *GetTemplateParameterList(TemplateDecl *TD) { // Make sure we get the template parameter list from the most // recent declaration, since that is the only one that is guaranteed to // have all the default template argument information. - return cast<TemplateDecl>(TD->getMostRecentDecl())->getTemplateParameters(); + Decl *ND = TD->getMostRecentDecl(); + // Skip past friend Decls because they are not supposed to contain default + // template arguments. Moreover, these declarations may introduce template + // parameters living in different template depths than the corresponding + // template parameters in TD, causing unmatched constraint substitution. + // + // C++23 N4950 [temp.param]p12 ---------------- zyn0217 wrote:
> In that case it’d make sense to add a test for a friend function template as > well if there isn’t already one to make sure this change doesn’t break that. I think the change is probably fine for friend function templates with default template parameters: they're unique across one TU, and we have ensured the next declaration we visit is non-null. So in such cases, I think ND would be the equivalent to "the most recent Decl". > but maybe cite the C++20 then in this case if it was added in C++20. Finally, I decided to use N3337 (aka C++11) since I couldn't find any related words prior to that draft, although gcc and clang don't allow such default arguments even in 98/03 mode. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86914 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits