HerrCai0907 wrote: > > Try getting rid of findNextTokenSkippingComments, and maybe just jump to > > begin() + token width > > Do you think it is a good idea to use > `ECD->getLocation().getLocWithOffset(ECD->getName().size())`?
It doesn't work for macro. I think the most precise way is to fix it is using `findNextTokenSkippingComments`. Why should we avoid to use `findNextTokenSkippingComments`? Is it for performance reasons? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86129 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
