rsmith added a comment. Hmm, this won't help when building libc++ as a module, and we don't have a wrapper header to hold these undefs since <stdatomic.h> is not part of c++.
So either that combination of includes gives a broken <atomic> or a broken <stdatomic.h>, or we do something nonstandard like reimplementing the latter in terms of the former in libc++. Eric, Marshall, what do you think? How / how much should we support this non-c++ header? https://reviews.llvm.org/D26376 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
