Thank you, Richard. Shall I merge the newly introduced test/CodeGenCXX/ubsan-vtable-checks.cpp into catch-undef-behavior.cpp or it's more clear when it's standalone?
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Ivan Krasin via cfe-commits < > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> krasin added a comment. >> >> Small correction: all UBSan type checks tests live in compiler-rt. > > > Actually, most of the UBSan tests live in > test/CodeGenCXX/catch-undef-behavior.cpp > in Clang; the compiler-rt tests are merely aiming to test that the runtime > produces the correct diagnostics. There are a few more test files testing > UBSan besides that one; you can find the tests by grepping for "fsanitize=" > in Clang's test/ directory. > > >> There is a test for UBsan + devirtualization inside tools/clang. My point >> still stands. >> >> >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D26559 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >> > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
