================ @@ -321,9 +321,11 @@ void aarch64::getAArch64TargetFeatures(const Driver &D, } } - if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_mno_unaligned_access, - options::OPT_munaligned_access)) { - if (A->getOption().matches(options::OPT_mno_unaligned_access)) + if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg( + options::OPT_mstrict_align, options::OPT_mno_strict_align, + options::OPT_mno_unaligned_access, options::OPT_munaligned_access)) { + if (A->getOption().matches(options::OPT_mstrict_align) || + A->getOption().matches(options::OPT_mno_unaligned_access)) ---------------- wzssyqa wrote:
Why keep `mno_unaligned_access` for AArch64 while remove it from RISC-V and LoongArch? In fact `mno_unaligned_access` is not supported by GCC for AArch64? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85350 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits