================
@@ -8955,6 +8962,22 @@ class BuiltinOperatorOverloadBuilder {
(S.Context.getAuxTargetInfo() &&
S.Context.getAuxTargetInfo()->hasInt128Type()))
ArithmeticTypes.push_back(S.Context.UnsignedInt128Ty);
+
+ /// _BitInt overloads are a bit special. We don't want to add candidates
+ /// for the entire family of _BitInt types, so instead we only add
+ /// candidates for the unique, unqualified _BitInt types present in the
+ /// candidate type set. The candidate set already handled ensuring the type
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
This comment is a bit weird imo. "We don't want to add candidates for the
entire family of _BitInt types" seems a bit obvious (and if we wanted to do
that, wouldn't we need a lot more special handling any way?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84755
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
