EricWF accepted this revision. EricWF added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26458#590865, @rmaprath wrote: > Not sure if either of these tests add much value to the no-exceptions > variant, using `std::nested_exception` with such a library seem pointless to > me. Perhaps marking these as `UNSUPPORTED` is a better fix? There are cases where it is useful to be able to name `std::nested_exception` while exceptions are disabled. I agree with @rogfer01 on this patch. https://reviews.llvm.org/D26458 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
