================
@@ -64,38 +64,53 @@ static bool hasOptionalClassName(const CXXRecordDecl &RD) {
return false;
}
+static const CXXRecordDecl *getOptionalBaseClass(const CXXRecordDecl *RD) {
+ if (RD == nullptr)
+ return nullptr;
+ if (hasOptionalClassName(*RD))
+ return RD;
+
+ if (!RD->hasDefinition())
+ return nullptr;
+
+ for (const CXXBaseSpecifier &Base : RD->bases())
+ if (Base.getAccessSpecifier() == AS_public)
----------------
Xazax-hun wrote:
I wonder if we can still get in trouble with private or protected inheritance.
E.g., if I had `class Foo : std::optional`, I could still call the methods of
`std::optional ` in `Foo`'s methods. Could we get in trouble while analyzing
those methods?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84138
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
