jrtc27 wrote: > By the way, is there any plan to support `CFLUSH.I.L1` in the future?
Flushing the instruction cache doesn't make sense given it can never be dirty. Invalidating/discarding does, but that's just what fence.i is doing? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83896 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
