Botond =?utf-8?q?István_Horváth?=,Botond Istvan Horvath
 <horvath.botond.ist...@gmail.com>,Botond Istvan Horvath
 <horvath.botond.ist...@gmail.com>,Botond Istvan Horvath
 <horvath.botond.ist...@gmail.com>,Botond Istvan Horvath
 <horvath.botond.ist...@gmail.com>,Botond Istvan Horvath
 <horvath.botond.ist...@gmail.com>,Botond Istvan Horvath
 <horvath.botond.ist...@gmail.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83...@github.com>


cor3ntin wrote:

> @erichkeane a question: this PR is partly a fix for a DR for c++20. Right now 
> I only apply the fix for C++20 and newer. Is there a reason for not applying 
> this fix for older standards? I don't see how it would break any existing 
> code, and making the fix retroactive doesn't make any test fail.

I don't think checking for c++20 is useful because rewritten candidates are a 
c++20- feature anyway  

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83279
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to