Botond =?utf-8?q?István_Horváth?=,Botond Istvan Horvath <horvath.botond.ist...@gmail.com>,Botond Istvan Horvath <horvath.botond.ist...@gmail.com>,Botond Istvan Horvath <horvath.botond.ist...@gmail.com>,Botond Istvan Horvath <horvath.botond.ist...@gmail.com>,Botond Istvan Horvath <horvath.botond.ist...@gmail.com>,Botond Istvan Horvath <horvath.botond.ist...@gmail.com> Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83...@github.com>
cor3ntin wrote: > @erichkeane a question: this PR is partly a fix for a DR for c++20. Right now > I only apply the fix for C++20 and newer. Is there a reason for not applying > this fix for older standards? I don't see how it would break any existing > code, and making the fix retroactive doesn't make any test fail. I don't think checking for c++20 is useful because rewritten candidates are a c++20- feature anyway https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83279 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits