llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1 Author: Exile (mzyKi) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> ```bool evalCall(const CallEvent &Call, CheckerContext &C)``` is corret form. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83677.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CheckerDocumentation.cpp (+1-1) ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CheckerDocumentation.cpp b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CheckerDocumentation.cpp index 3e5e2b9139149d..0ca0c487b64550 100644 --- a/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CheckerDocumentation.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CheckerDocumentation.cpp @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ class CheckerDocumentation : public Checker< check::PreStmt<ReturnStmt>, /// first one wins. /// /// eval::Call - bool evalCall(const CallExpr *CE, CheckerContext &C) const { return true; } + bool evalCall(const CallEvent &Call, CheckerContext &C) const { return true; } /// Handles assumptions on symbolic values. /// `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83677 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits