michaelrj-google wrote: This patch looks fine from my end, but I was wondering: Does clang do warnings for printf flags that don't apply to a specific conversion? As an example, in the format specifier `"%+R"` is technically undefined since the `+` flag only applies to signed conversions. In practice it's not a big deal (we just ignore irrelevant flags) but it could be an area of further development.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82855 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
