srhines added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26385#589589, @eugenis wrote:
> This is a good change, but I don't think it is the right fix for PR30940. > Instead of handling this in the NDK, we should change *::getIRStackGuard to > fallback to __stack_chk_guard when targeting an old version. Right, this is only addressing part of the problem related to that issue. I can probably put together a follow up to address the rest of the bug, although I am not all that familiar with __stack_chk_guard, so testing might be a problem. https://reviews.llvm.org/D26385 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
