AaronBallman wrote: Ah, thank you for the extra information! We definitely cannot go back to recommonmark, but perhaps @cor3ntin can find a way to restore the older behavior there. However, I think finding the minimal set of dependencies might be brittle in terms of long-term maintenance (so if it turns out it's significant effort to support the old behavior, I think the extra package may be the price we pay for getting off an unmaintained package).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65664 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
