================ @@ -1382,6 +1382,20 @@ void DeclSpec::Finish(Sema &S, const PrintingPolicy &Policy) { ThreadStorageClassSpec = TSCS_unspecified; ThreadStorageClassSpecLoc = SourceLocation(); } + if (S.getLangOpts().C23 && + getConstexprSpecifier() == ConstexprSpecKind::Constexpr) { + S.Diag(ConstexprLoc, diag::err_invalid_decl_spec_combination) + << DeclSpec::getSpecifierName(getThreadStorageClassSpec()) + << SourceRange(getThreadStorageClassSpecLoc()); + } + } + + if (S.getLangOpts().C23 && ---------------- AaronBallman wrote:
I think we need something similar here for mixing `typedef` and `constexpr`. A potential test case would be: ``` typedef constexpr int Foo; constexpr typedef int Bar; ``` https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73099 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits