MaskRay wrote: > Why not just enforce -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow with -fwrapv? I > suspect it's just overlook, and not intentional behavior.
+1 We should consider this direction https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80089 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
