klimek added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26288#586932, @ioeric wrote:
> - Addressed comments: handle non-existing files. We're not really handling them now though? We're just printing an error? My point is that we might run the replacement generation on a distributed system, and then group/deduplicate/apply them somewhere where the files might not actually exist (think the reduce stage of a mapreduce). If possible, I'd like to not rely on the existence of the file when we deal with Replacements. I'd find it especially problematic if the existence or non-existence of files changes the semantics of those operations. https://reviews.llvm.org/D26288 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
