Author: Timm Bäder Date: 2024-02-09T10:12:25+01:00 New Revision: df2513c80bbd444ce97d28961bd5c20ffd7d3c44
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/df2513c80bbd444ce97d28961bd5c20ffd7d3c44 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/df2513c80bbd444ce97d28961bd5c20ffd7d3c44.diff LOG: [clang][Interp] Fix three-way comparison detection Instead of using !T && CPlusPlus, just check the BinaryOperator's opcode. Turns out we also hit this code path for some assignments of structs in C++. Added: Modified: clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp clang/test/SemaCXX/conditional-expr.cpp Removed: ################################################################################ diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp index 21bc29ff8ee2e5..bf456155b241b8 100644 --- a/clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/AST/Interp/ByteCodeExprGen.cpp @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ bool ByteCodeExprGen<Emitter>::VisitBinaryOperator(const BinaryOperator *BO) { // Special case for C++'s three-way/spaceship operator <=>, which // returns a std::{strong,weak,partial}_ordering (which is a class, so doesn't // have a PrimType). - if (!T && Ctx.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) { + if (!T && BO->getOpcode() == BO_Cmp) { if (DiscardResult) return true; const ComparisonCategoryInfo *CmpInfo = diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/conditional-expr.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/conditional-expr.cpp index 9a5e2bac43413d..01effaa189322b 100644 --- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/conditional-expr.cpp +++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/conditional-expr.cpp @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fcxx-exceptions -fexceptions -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,expected-cxx11 -std=c++11 -Wsign-conversion %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fcxx-exceptions -fexceptions -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,expected-cxx11 -std=c++11 -Wsign-conversion %s -fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fcxx-exceptions -fexceptions -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,expected-cxx17 -std=c++17 -Wsign-conversion %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fcxx-exceptions -fexceptions -fsyntax-only -verify=expected,expected-cxx17 -std=c++17 -Wsign-conversion %s -fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter // C++ rules for ?: are a lot stricter than C rules, and have to take into // account more conversion options. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits