Sirraide wrote: > I think the confusion/conflict between this and clang::assume needs to be > figured out. These two should just be, as close as possible, spellings of the > same thing.
Well, apparently, `clang::assume` always takes a string and is meant for OMP assumptions, so one solution would be to just apply `clang::assume` semantics iff the argument is a string literal since string literals would always be converted to `true` anyway. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81014 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
